[求助]
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">Wendy老师:</font></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">Happy New Year! 谢谢老师上次帮我的解答,能不能请老师再帮我解释下面这句话?谢谢!老师要注意身体哦!</font></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">In London’s case, the urban the non-urban London boroughs that flank the river’s course each has its own reasons for keeping ‘their’ river nice. And if their own reasons do not hold out a sufficiently attractive carrot, the government also wields a compelling stick.</font></span></p> <div class="quote"><b>以下是引用<i>awinsun</i>在2007-2-18 22:57:53的发言：</b><br/><p>请教: Smoking, it is believed, is responsible for <font color="#e61a42">30 per cent of all deaths from cancer</font> and clearly represents the most important preventable cause of cancer in countries like the United States today. 译为? </p><p>Questions 18-21 </p><p>18. <font color="#f70938">Thirty per cent of deaths</font> in the United States are caused by smoking-related dieases.</p><p>这道题为什么是 NO?</p></div><p>原文说的是癌症致死的30%，题目意思是所有的死亡的30%，按原文来看，吸烟致死占所有死亡的比率应该小于30%</p> i am one the students of 6.5 in xuhui starting from 1.29. i enjoyed your reading lesson so much that it would be great to have my last reading lesson in this course on 2.26 when unfortunately i will have to be absent. i remember you mentioned on 2.12 you are going to share another 3 hours with our class to complete the whole course, probably in the evening. would you please tell me the exact time? i will check my time to see if i can make it in the evening. thank you <p>最好有相关原文的翻译版就好了~这样就不用老是麻烦WENDY帮忙一句一句解释翻译了...汗...</p> <p>The current trend towards blurring these role signs in dress is <font color="#ee1169">probably democratic(译为:),</font> but it also makes some people very insecure.</p><p></p><p>It is interesting to observe, for instance, some decline in the emphasis given to marriage rituals. This could be taken as an indication that there is no longer such a big change in role from single to married person, and therefore no need for a public change in sign. 译为:</p><p></p><p>These and other perquisites of status are often frowned upon, but they may serve a purpose as a kind of uniform in a democratic society. 译为:</p> <strong><font color="#ff0000"><p><u><font face="黑体" color="#4d2bd5" size="4">dear wendy:</font></u></p><p><u><font face="黑体" color="#4d2bd5" size="4">happy new year!!!</font></u></p><p><u><font face="黑体" color="#4d2bd5" size="4">我是papaya不知道您还记得不？最近看了3/3的凉月预测说有可能会写流程图，很担心啊，我该准备些什么呀！？</font></u></p><p>[em06][em03]</p></font></strong> <div class="quote"><b>以下是引用<i>awinsun</i>在2007-2-21 12:55:40的发言：</b><br/><p>The current trend towards blurring these role signs in dress is <font color="#ee1169">probably democratic(译为:),</font> but it also makes some people very insecure.</p><p></p><p>It is interesting to observe, for instance, some decline in the emphasis given to marriage rituals. This could be taken as an indication that there is no longer such a big change in role from single to married person, and therefore no need for a public change in sign. 译为:</p><p></p><p>These and other perquisites of status are often frowned upon, but they may serve a purpose as a kind of uniform in a democratic society. 译为:</p></div><p>１．目前有一种趋势，是要淡化服装作为角色记号的作用，这种趋势可能很民主（ＤＥＭＯＣＲＡＴＩＣ），但它也让一些人觉的很不安全．</p><p>２．例如，可以很有意思的观察到，对于结婚仪式的强调性有所下降，这就表明从单身到已婚角色方面已不再有太大的改变，因此也不需要公共角色符号的转换．</p><p>３．这些和地位的其它特权经常受到质疑，但在一个民主社会，它们和服装起到了同样的作用．</p><p>另外补充以下，如果你是我阅读班的学生，这些句子在相关的Ｔ，Ｆ，ＮＧ的题目中我在上课时全部都解释过，所以你可以首先先看一下我上课的阅读笔记．</p> <div class="quote"><b>以下是引用<i>donandken</i>在2007-2-21 9:24:28的发言：</b><br/><div class="quote"><b>以下是引用<i>awinsun</i>在2007-2-18 22:57:53的发言：</b><br/><p>请教: Smoking, it is believed, is responsible for <font color="#e61a42">30 per cent of all deaths from cancer</font> and clearly represents the most important preventable cause of cancer in countries like the United States today. 译为? </p><p>Questions 18-21 </p><p>18. <font color="#f70938">Thirty per cent of deaths</font> in the United States are caused by smoking-related dieases.</p><p>这道题为什么是 NO?</p></div><p>原文说的是癌症致死的30%，题目意思是所有的死亡的30%，按原文来看，吸烟致死占所有死亡的比率应该小于30%</p></div><p></p>谢谢ＤＯＮＡＮＤＫＥＮ帮我解释，的确是这样的，这到题我上课时讲过 <div class="quote"><b>以下是引用<i>chaussen</i>在2007-2-21 12:45:27的发言：</b><br/>i am one the students of 6.5 in xuhui starting from 1.29. i enjoyed your reading lesson so much that it would be great to have my last reading lesson in this course on 2.26 when unfortunately i will have to be absent. i remember you mentioned on 2.12 you are going to share another 3 hours with our class to complete the whole course, probably in the evening. would you please tell me the exact time? i will check my time to see if i can make it in the evening. thank you</div><p></p>很抱歉，这个我还要等到２６号时和你们班同学商量过才行，因为还要依你们的决定为主，实在不好意思． <div class="quote"><b>以下是引用<i>irene8023kimi</i>在2007-2-20 13:15:58的发言：</b><br/><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">Wendy老师:</font></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">Happy New Year! 谢谢老师上次帮我的解答,能不能请老师再帮我解释下面这句话?谢谢!老师要注意身体哦!</font></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><span lang="EN-US"><font face="Times New Roman">In London’s case, the urban the non-urban London boroughs that flank the river’s course each has its own reasons for keeping ‘their’ river nice. And if their own reasons do not hold out a sufficiently attractive carrot, the government also wields a compelling stick.</font></span></p></div><p>就伦敦来说，位于河道两侧的城市和非城市的行政自制区都有自己的理由保持＂它们＂河流的干净．况且如果他们自己的原因还不够有吸引力和说服力，那么政府也可以使用强制措施．</p><p>这只是一个初步翻译，因为不知道上下文，所以不知道确切不确切．</p> <div class="quote"><b>以下是引用<i>papaya808</i>在2007-2-21 16:07:08的发言：</b><br/><strong><font color="#ff0000"><p><u><font face="黑体" color="#4d2bd5" size="4">dear wendy:</font></u></p><p><u><font face="黑体" color="#4d2bd5" size="4">happy new year!!!</font></u></p><p><u><font face="黑体" color="#4d2bd5" size="4">我是papaya不知道您还记得不？最近看了3/3的凉月预测说有可能会写流程图，很担心啊，我该准备些什么呀！？</font></u></p><p>[em06][em03]</p></font></strong></div><p></p>亲爱的，我只能给你的是精神上的鼓舞和支持，实质帮助很少，因为流程图变化点跟多，没有人能够预计将考什么样的图，不过流程图就是看图说话，关键是考试时能看的懂图[em09][em09] <p><font size="5">dear wendy</font></p><p><font size="5">谢谢你的鼓励！考试时，偶一定睁大眼睛，抓住细节，上帝保佑我，阿门！</font></p>[em07] <p>亲爱的<strong>尹老师:</strong></p><p><strong> 我是3月10日的考试,在澳洲的悉尼考,是考A类的,我的听力和写作还有阅读都不是很好,能不能给我预测一些机经,真的谢谢你了,麻烦你能否发到我的信箱里面吗?</strong></p><p><strong> 邮箱地址:SINDYXU7@HOTMAIL.COM</strong></p> wenndy 我是1月15号18号教室的学生 我忘记你上次怎么叫我们去做那400篇的沉浸式联系 你能再说次吗 发到我的邮箱里也可以<a href="mailto:jackeywangxin@163.com">jackeywangxin@163.com</a> 万分感激 <p>question about the TFN of reading1,test1 in Cam4:</p><p>it says in the passage1 "these misconceptions(of children,about science) do not remain isolated but become incorporated into a multifaceted,but organised,conceptual framework,making it and the component ideas,some of which are erroneous,more robust but also accessible to modification." and the question is "the fact that children's ideas about science form part of a larger framework of ideas means that it is easier to change them."</p><p>i chose FALSE at first because i understood that the word"means" here has sth to do with cause and effect, but it feels like no relation of that sort is in original sentence. thinking it over, i changed it into TRUE only by "framework" and "accessible to modification" despite other info to consider in a simpler way.</p><p></p><p>also,question 7"the study reported here follows on from a series of studies that have looked at children's understanding of rainforests."</p><p>i found "these observations are generally consistent with our previous studies of pupils' views about the use and conservation of rainforests...", but i doubt if "views about the use and conservation of rainforests" can be seen as the same as "understanding of rainforests" though i chose TRUE.</p><p>would you please tell me the right answer and the reason?thank you<br/></p> <font face="宋体" color="#f70938" size="7">元宵快乐</font> <div class="quote"><b>以下是引用<i>chaussen</i>在2007-3-2 16:38:36的发言：</b><br/><p>question about the TFN of reading1,test1 in Cam4:</p><p>it says in the passage1 "these misconceptions(of children,about science) do not remain isolated but become incorporated into a multifaceted,but organised,conceptual framework,making it and the component ideas,some of which are erroneous,more robust but also accessible to modification." and the question is "the fact that children's ideas about science form part of a larger framework of ideas means that it is easier to change them."</p><p>i chose FALSE at first because i understood that the word"means" here has sth to do with cause and effect, but it feels like no relation of that sort is in original sentence. thinking it over, i changed it into TRUE only by "framework" and "accessible to modification" despite other info to consider in a simpler way.</p><p></p><p>also,question 7"the study reported here follows on from a series of studies that have looked at children's understanding of rainforests."</p><p>i found "these observations are generally consistent with our previous studies of pupils' views about the use and conservation of rainforests...", but i doubt if "views about the use and conservation of rainforests" can be seen as the same as "understanding of rainforests" though i chose TRUE.</p><p>would you please tell me the right answer and the reason?thank you<br/></p></div><p>这2题答案都是TRUE</p><p>accessible to =easier to change</p><p>文章里说这些误解不是孤立的，是组成了一个尽管多面但是很有条理的体系，使这个观点更加稳固，但是也更容易被改变</p><p>题目意思是：孩子的观点构成了一个更庞大的体系，也意味着更容易被改变</p><p>所以应该是TRUE</p><p></p><p>view和understanding一个意思吧，都是观点理解的意思吧</p><p>答案也是TRUE</p> <p>TFN question about test 2 in cam4</p><p>question10: the navajo language will die out because it currently has too few speakers.</p><p>it seems to me the anwser is shown in "in the native american navajo nation...the native language is dying.most of its speakers are middle-aged or elderly."</p><p>is"too few speakers" a reason which conflicts with "too old speakers",or they are parallel in meaning? i chose NOT GIVEN because i figure it may be a reason not mentioned.did i fail to think of it straight?</p>[align=right][color=#000066][此贴子已经被作者于2007-3-3 23:09:16编辑过][/color][/align]
<p>i came up with some difficulties in TFN,passage1,test3 of cam4</p><p>its name is "micro-enterprise credit for street youth". question 9--any street child can set up their own small business if given enough support seems hard to be located because keywords"child","business" and "support" appeared in many places.is there any efficient way to find the targets of that sort except reading thoroughly? are this kind of questions often seen in IELTS?</p><p>and finally i found "being an entrepreneur is not for everyone,nor for every street child." but i am not sure whether it is NO or NOT GIVEN.</p><p></p><p>again,question10"in some cases,the families of street children may need financial support from S.K.I" must have something to do with money. the only part of passage linking S.K.I and money is "Small loans are provided initially for purchasing fixed assets such as bicycles, shoe shine kits and basic building materials for a market stall..." without mentioning the "families", which appears two times: "...a dearth of adepuately funded schools,the demand for income at home,family breakdown..." and "there are street children who take pride in supporting themselves and their families.."</p><p>so is it safe to choose NOT GIVEN?<br/></p> 能不能用中文啊，E文看着头大 <div class="quote"><b>以下是引用<i>chaussen</i>在2007-3-3 23:08:11的发言：</b><br/><p>TFN question about test 2 in cam4</p><p>question10: the navajo language will die out because it currently has too few speakers.</p><p>it seems to me the anwser is shown in "in the native american navajo nation...the native language is dying.most of its speakers are middle-aged or elderly."</p><p>is"too few speakers" a reason which conflicts with "too old speakers",or they are parallel in meaning? i chose NOT GIVEN because i figure it may be a reason not mentioned.did i fail to think of it straight?</p><br/></div><p></p><p>答案是NO</p><p>文中明确说明灭绝的原因是middle-aged or elderly，而不是 too few speakers。</p><p>如果文中没有明确说灭绝的原因是什么，那就应该是NG...（WENDY...应该是这样吧）</p> <div class="quote"><b>以下是引用<i>chaussen</i>在2007-3-4 0:00:31的发言：</b><br/><p>i came up with some difficulties in TFN,passage1,test3 of cam4</p><p>its name is "micro-enterprise credit for street youth". question 9--any street child can set up their own small business if given enough support seems hard to be located because keywords"child","business" and "support" appeared in many places.is there any efficient way to find the targets of that sort except reading thoroughly? are this kind of questions often seen in IELTS?</p><p>and finally i found "being an entrepreneur is not for everyone,nor for every street child." but i am not sure whether it is NO or NOT GIVEN.</p><p></p><p>again,question10"in some cases,the families of street children may need financial support from S.K.I" must have something to do with money. the only part of passage linking S.K.I and money is "Small loans are provided initially for purchasing fixed assets such as bicycles, shoe shine kits and basic building materials for a market stall..." without mentioning the "families", which appears two times: "...a dearth of adepuately funded schools,the demand for income at home,family breakdown..." and "there are street children who take pride in supporting themselves and their families.."</p><p>so is it safe to choose NOT GIVEN?<br/></p></div><p>第9题是NO，文中明确说了NOT FOR EVERYONE，FOR RVERY STREET CHILD，当时做的时候我是根据上下文关系来定位的，应题目不长而且KEY WORDS应该是ANY STREET CHILD</p><p>ANSWER FOR NO10 IS NG...THERE IS NO RELATION BETWEEN THEM</p>
[align=right][color=#000066][此贴子已经被作者于2007-3-5 19:19:02编辑过][/color][/align]
wenndy ,我是1月15号 18号教室开班的学生JACKY,就是经常做在你边上的,以前你和我们说的400编沉浸式练习的做法我忘了，能再告诉我一遍不，你可以回贴也可以发到我的e-mail <a href="mailto:jackeywangxin@163.com">jackeywangxin@163.com</a> 谢谢了