无忧雅思论坛's Archiver

chrx9118 发表于 2008-9-4 21:28

up  thx !
:sa :sa

sharkowenG 发表于 2008-9-5 00:22

i want to have a look

pinkcici 发表于 2008-9-5 08:39

THANKS FOR

小列那狐 发表于 2008-9-11 12:08

SDFASDASDSADSADA

wwancai 发表于 2008-9-11 14:32

ffsdfsadfdfsdfsdfdf

hiwestgate 发表于 2008-9-11 14:52

帖隐藏的内容需要回复才可以浏览

l0vehyy00 发表于 2008-9-11 17:32

:nu1 :nu1 :nu1 :nu1 看看 先。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

asianlad 发表于 2008-9-14 21:39

kankankankankan

ythland 发表于 2008-9-29 20:51

是不是蚊子网之类的

hangna 发表于 2008-10-3 15:58

MBJMBB LK,BLK

dzxwdzys 发表于 2008-10-3 18:00

upup:che2 !!!!!!

2008chaojiniu 发表于 2008-10-3 18:11

大大大大大大大大大大大

elmayoo 发表于 2008-10-6 22:09

:po :po :po

Joyce_Chung 发表于 2008-10-9 11:50

thxs a million!

georgeabe 发表于 2008-10-11 00:07

fddddddddddddddddddddddddd

rxdxjmjenny 发表于 2008-10-14 16:55

111111111111

11111111111111111

wenzi891 发表于 2008-10-15 09:07

看看谢谢哦

xiao8899yang 发表于 2008-10-15 09:23

看看看看
:sa

mnwo 发表于 2008-10-21 07:12

kan kan ba

seanner 发表于 2008-10-21 10:28

:nu2 :xin1 :sa :qian1

smartbirt 发表于 2008-10-21 10:44

ssssssssssssssssssssss

jasmissyou 发表于 2008-10-21 18:01

kankan ~~~

corlyon 发表于 2008-10-22 00:24

难吃
[align=right]环球学员[font=Times New Roman]        [/font]陈[font=Times New Roman] [/font]旭[/align][font=Times New Roman]Recently, more and more people believethat a building should serve its purpose rather than looking beautiful.Whether the architects should worry about buildings as works of art hasbecome an issue of controversy. Before presenting my opinion, I wouldlike to probe into both sides of the debate.[/font]
[font=Times New Roman] [/font]
[font=Times New Roman]Critics argue about the shortcomings ofbuildings designed as works of art. First of all, it needs a great sumof money to design beautiful buildings with extra decorations. Mostpeople would like to have better infrastructures and recreativefacilities rather than a better look. Secondly, the side effectsbrought by artistic designs also arouse people’s wide concern. Theyworry about the safety of buildings and they believe the steadiness ismore essential. Last but not least, the appearance which is loved bythe designers may not be accepted by everyone. Different people havediscrepant views. It is easier said than done to settle a proposalsatisfying everybody.[/font]
[font=Times New Roman] [/font]
[font=Times New Roman]Supporters also claim that there are alarge number of benefits following the special architectures. For onething, we can hand down our cultural heritages by constructions. If wefail to build up symbols of our tradition, our descendants may forgetit someday. For another thing, it’s also a good way to enhance theembellishment. There is no doubt that a good image of the city couldsuccessfully attract the world’s attention and provide the dwellerswith more opportunities. Also worth mentioning is that it can give usgood feelings. Under such circumstance, people could work moreefficiently and rest more comfortably.[/font]
[font=Times New Roman] [/font]
[font=Times New Roman]Generally speaking, both of their viewsare rational. But personally, I side with the latter one. Anyway, wedon’t want to live in a world with the same buildings, the same coloursand the same styles.[/font]

sprachel 发表于 2008-10-22 16:06

thx
哦,大家努力加油拉

dongmu0106 发表于 2008-10-22 21:15

好好好好好

就爱吃橙子 发表于 2008-10-22 22:47

DDDDDDDDDDDDD

DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

sugarbabycc 发表于 2008-10-22 22:48

good:po :po

nalanqiuci 发表于 2008-10-22 23:02

0000000000000000

hxl_0809 发表于 2008-10-23 13:13

好!!!:che2

无双甜甜圈 发表于 2008-10-23 18:52

说说看啊

dable 发表于 2008-10-23 19:16

看看~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

beyondwj36 发表于 2008-10-27 13:23

sdruseuasua

panmx 发表于 2008-10-28 10:16

顶一下再看,看看多难。

悠悠fly 发表于 2008-11-2 14:05

看看~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

kobejames 发表于 2008-11-2 20:31

看看~~~~

jmy009 发表于 2008-11-4 15:42

好11111111111111111

jin412 发表于 2008-11-6 01:37

goooooooooooooooooooooooooooood!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

bibi_pretty 发表于 2008-11-6 18:19

11

show la plz

jackany1 发表于 2008-11-9 18:32

多谢 看来很有帮助~

xzh1985xzh 发表于 2008-11-9 18:44

cao kao wao

页: 1 2 3 [4] 5
Google
 

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.