雅思下载 雅思预测 雅思杂烩 A类 G类 海外考雅 雅思听力 雅思阅读 雅思写作 雅思口语 新 托 福
澳洲留学 移民澳洲 澳洲签证 澳洲生活 新西兰 亚洲留学 省钱诀窍 电脑技巧 汽车沙龙 英语学习
英国留学 英国签证 英国生活 欧洲留学 他乡生活 创业故事 回国发展 音乐之声 影音世界 体育同盟
加国留学 移民加国 人在加国 人在美国 情感世界 职场丽人 养儿育女 笑口长开 餐饮美食 无忧家园
热点关注 军事天地 史海钩沉 文学艺术 金融理财 健康医疗 美女帅哥 社会传真 娱乐八卦 机票代理
返回列表 回复 发帖

G类范文一篇

<DIV class=Section1>
<P ><B ><FONT face="Times New Roman">WRITING TASK 2<o:p></o:p></FONT></B></P>
<P ><B ><o:p><FONT face="Times New Roman"> </FONT></o:p></B></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman">You should spend about 20 minutes on this task<o:p></o:p></FONT></P>
<P ><B ><I ><o:p><FONT face="Times New Roman"> </FONT></o:p></I></B></P>
<P ><B ><I ><FONT face="Times New Roman">With the pressures on today’s young people to succeed academically, some people believe that non-academic subjects at school (eg: physical education and cookery) should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects.<BR ><BR ><o:p></o:p></FONT></I></B></P>
<P ><B ><I ><FONT face="Times New Roman">To what extent do you agree or disagree?<o:p></o:p></FONT></I></B></P>
<P ><B ><I ><o:p><FONT face="Times New Roman"> </FONT></o:p></I></B></P>
<P ><FONT face="Times New Roman">You should write at least 250 words. <o:p></o:p></FONT></P><BR  clear=all>
<P >What young people should study at school has long been the subject of intense debate and this is a question that certainly does not have one correct answer.<o:p></o:p></P>
<P >We need to provide young people the best possible chance of doing well at school. In traditional curriculum there is a wide variety of subjects with a mix of academic and non-academic subjects. In this way a young person is formed with a rounded education. Non-academic subjects would include sports, cooking, woodwork and metalwork. I believe this is the best form of education. A young person should learn things other than academic subjects. Sport is particularly important. Young people have to learn to love sport so that they can be fit and healthy later in life. If not we will be raising an obese and unfit generation.<o:p></o:p></P>
<P >I totally understand the point of view that education is so important that students must be pushed as hard as possible to achieve their best. It sounds a good idea to only expose the students to academic subjects as then they can spend all of their school hours on studying areas that will get them into university and good jobs later in life. I just feel a more rounded education would produce a better individual. We must remember too that a lot of people, maybe even most people, aren’t academically minded and would benefit more from a more vocationally based education. Forcing academic studies onto them would lead to failure and the student leaving school too early.<o:p></o:p></P></DIV><BR  clear=all>
<P >Therefore I agree that although a wholly academic curriculum would suit and benefit some young people, I believe that for most students non-academic subjects are important inclusions still in today’s syllabuses.<o:p></o:p></P>
返回列表
Google