|
 
- UID
- 5219
- 帖子
- 75
- 精华
- 2
- 积分
- 33896
- 无忧币
- 0 元
- 声望
- 1077 点
- 阅读权限
- 100
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 注册时间
- 2003-1-13
- 最后登录
- 2006-5-19
|
1#
发表于 2003-6-28 23:03
| 只看该作者
我考完了,把我准备的文章给大家希望有用,真心祝大家好运!!!我明天(6/29)考口语也请大家祝我好运吧,谢谢了,呵呵!
V104
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so the protection means wasting resource. To what extent do you agree or disagree?(266words)
Whether or not to protect wild animals attracts much attention, which has never happened before. Some argues that the protection is a waste of money, for there is no enough place for people, not mention wild animal. As me, protecting animals is such a serious problem that we can’t shrug off lightly, instead, we should solve it as soon as possible.
The animals have the equal right of living with human beings. Although Darwin said that “survival is fittest”, the real reason why the number of wild animal is sharply decreasing is not natural elimination but human being’s destruction. So we need to stop destroying the habitant of wild animals and knock ourselves out to save the wild animals’ lives.
In addition, the existence of wild animal can keep natural balance. The circulation of world has lasted thousands of years. If one part of this circulation ---the wild animals became extinct, the result should be unimagineable.
Last but not least, wild animal are precious deposit to human. For example, a least research proves that there is an unusual enzyme which can change fiber, such as leaves and bamboo, into edible things. This discovery can greatly solve the problem of food. The most important thing is that the magical enzyme can just be found from pandas. Therefore we can see that animal is not a waste but endless valuables to human.
In conclusion, it is unreasonable for people not to protect wild animal. After all, we can’t let the sad thing happen --- our children can just learn what monkey and tiger are from pictures and TV.
Version 108
The gap of living in cities and the countryside is larger and larger. What are the reasons in your country and how to reduce the differences?
Nowadays, the gap between the city and the countryside becomes more and more overt, which arouses colossal concerns. To understand the solution, let’s take a closer look at the causes of the gap at first.
The main reason of the gap is the unequal investment between city and rural area. China is a typical example. While more and more money is being invested to the coastal areas and big cities, such as Beijing and Shanghai, the lack of investment barriers greatly the society development of rural area and western regions
The low education level partly sharps the gap. There is no doubt that the prime force of productivity is education. However, because of poverty, thousands of people go to work without graduating from primary school. The poorer, the few children go to school. This bad cycle finally leads to the dream of rich becoming a dream that is hard to realize.
Moreover, the rural area is short of people with high quality. A survey proved that most of university students, whether they come from city or countryside, choose big cities instead of poor areas to work. The rural area can neither adept talent man nor attract talent man. No wonder the gap is increasing largely.
Hence, The government ought to knock itself out to decrease the gap as soon as possible. First, balance the investment between city and rural area. In addition, the education level should be improved, especially pay attention on raising high quality people. Besides, let more people realize the latent capacity of rural area in order to attract talent and investment. The set up of CCTV channel12—western region channel is a good example.
Only when the ways mentioned above are realized step by step, can the gap between the cities and the countryside be bridged.
V109
The computers are widely used in education and some people think teacher are not play important role in the classroom. What extend do you agree?
In this IT age, computers are widely used in the classroom in order to enrich the methods of teaching. This phenomenon gives some the illusion that the thing teaching students is no longer the teacher but a computer. Personally, I disagree with this opinion.
As another machines, computer doesn’t enable to control itself. Though computers are capable of learning from their mistakes and improving on their performance, they need details instructions from human being in order to be able to operate. They can never, as it were lead independent lives, no mention teaching students. In case a computer lacks the control of a teacher, there is no difference between a computer and waste.
Not only this, but computers, unlike a teacher, can’t solve a variety of new problems. Everything is developing in today’s society, including education. For example, a student suddenly asks a creative question that the computer isn’t programmed for, it can do nothing, while teacher can explain clearly though abundant teaching experience.
Last but not least, the computer can’t communicate with students from emotion. Such as an eyesight or gesture of teacher can transfer his or her idea and feeling to students. In this way, students can feel more human touch in the class. In comparison, the computer is too dry and dusty to understand.
All in all, no matter how nice a computer is, it can’t take the place of teacher. Of course, I don’t mean that computer is useless. In contrary, I believe it will become the most powerful assistants to teacher in further.
V110
Many of the world’s languages and culture are dying out. Give possible reasons and your recommendations.
Nowadays, the loss of the language and culture is becoming increasing serious. To seek the solution, let’s take a closer look at the causes of the languages and culture dying out at first
The main reason of the loss is that it lacks the support by government. Most governments pay more attention to economic developing. They neglect the importance of protecting those culture and languages. The people who speak small language couldn’t make a living at the old style any more. They have no choice but to learn other languages and connect with other.
文化和语言受强势文化的冲击partly sharpen the loss of culture and language. For example, some small countries don’t like to produce films themselves; So they export films directly for it is one way that one stone kill two birds, thus not only fulfilling the need of citizens but also reducing the risk greatly. However while people are interested in the films, the native film culture lost unconsciously.
Moreover, the culture and language doesn’t have heir. Some traditional cultures, such as Chinese xiju, are important to the world culture. However, because their culture values doesn’t realize and accept by young generation, who are always interested in the exciting and strange things, fewer of young men like to learn the old culture. In a long run, it will lead the culture to disappear gradually because of without heir
Hence this is a problem which must be solved as soon as possible, First, government ought to knock itself out to protect culture and language. Making a detailed list about the value of culture and language and a plan about how to protect them is necessary. In addition, let more people, especially the young men, realize the value of culture in order to prevent the culture loss because of without heir. Besides, We should not only protect but also develop the culture and language. What the Icelanders do is a typical example. They have led Ice land to coin its own new words for telephone and computer.
Only when the ways mentioned above are realized step by step, can the culture and language stop the doom of loss.
V111
Is it nature or nurture that plays a major role in the development of personality? What's your opinion?(278words)
Nowadays, most of children are the center of a family, so the issue about which plays major role in personality, nature or nurture, is paid increasing attention by parents. As to me, I am fond of that molding one's character depends on nurture rather than nature.
People's character will affect greatly by the people around them especially their parents. The survey proves the possibility of commit of person who deleted born in a family which have a crime is one to four times higher than the normal family's person's. To image, when a child shape character, always have a bad example around him or her, no wonder the crime possibility is much higher. So just as the saying goes:" he who keeps company with the wolf will learn to howl."
Moreover, the growing environment influences child's personality unconsciously. There is a famous story in China: Aiming to find a willing studying condition, a mother moves for three times. They at last move nearby school. From then on, the boy who used to be naughty corrects his bad habits and changes into a hardworking student. After he grows up, this boy becomes one of the greatest philosophers in Chinese history---Mencius.
This story really shows how important role that the environment play in children's personality.
Of course, we couldn't neglect the effect of nature, such as parents' gene. The child is a chip off the old block. Some characters proved by medical research have already existed before human were born.
All in all, as for one person's, both nature and nurture influence the development of quality. Personally, I believe the nurture can partly make up the shortage of nature.
V112
Companies should encourage old employees (55 years old) to retire, in order to give opportunities to the new generation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, some suggest that the old workers who are more than 55years older should encouraged to retire in order to give new generation more opportunities. Although I am also faced with the problem of finding a job, I disagree with suggestion.
Firstly, chronological age is not always a true indicator of ability. There is a widely held belief that older people are less adeptable. This is just not true: research has shown that differences in capability are as wide within age groups as they are between them. Thus people’s suitability of position should be reflected by their performance in the jobs, rather than by the number of white hairs they have. For example, my father is 58years old, but he still is the cream of the crop in his working area.
In addition, older workers are abundant in experience. Just as the saying goes: Years bring wisdom. In some profession, which experience is really important, like doctor, old people are valuables. If company retires its older employees, it will take much more time and money to train new workers.
Moreover, most of old workers have their feet on the ground. Therefore, they can help company reduce the risk greatly in developing process.
Last but not least, giving new generation opportunities can’t be given to new generation at the cost of retiring old people who still have working ability. We ought to try our best creating more position instead of let old retired arbitrarily.
All in all, it is unreasonable to let older people retire at a definite age. Whether or not to one retire should depend on one’s working ability. The best way is to employ fresh man and study with old expert, in this way both of old and fresh men will produce a marked effect.
|
|