设为首页收藏本站学习中心

无忧雅思

  • 公众微信: ielts51
  • 业务合作: 4006805851

新浪微博登陆

只需一步, 快速开始

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

返回列表 发新帖

雅思经典范文参考--政府是否应该投资在艺术领域

[复制链接]

新浪微博达人勋

  • TA的每日心情
    开心
    2019-1-25 14:59
  • 签到天数: 636 天

    [LV.9]以坛为家II

    发表于 2019-1-18 09:58 |显示全部楼层 | 阅读模式
    雅思精准核心预测

         近来雅思老师给的预测中有一经典题再次出现了,关于政府是不是应该投入更多资金在艺术事业上的问题重回雅思考生们眼中。小编尤记得那些年考雅思的时候就有这个老妖精~下面,雅思小编分析给大家一篇这一题目的范文供雅思备考童鞋参考。

      There has been an on-going heated debate on whether government should subsidy various forms of arts, such as music and painting. Some see the taxpayers’ money spent on arts as a worthwhile investment to facilitate the healthy development of arts, which is regarded as the scream of national culture. Reasonable may it sounds, it can be Idontknowlly misleading.

      In fact, government and arts make nothing more than a noxious brew. It can never be something of surprise after you have accepted the truth that the government’s subsidy always carries with it a danger of government interference and distortion. That is to say, there exists a risk of the arts to be harnessed as a political tool. Subsidized art, which is concerned with reflecting the political views of the government officials who fund it, will no longer be a revelation of social temper and the general state of mind of the majority.

      Thus, it can be safe to conclude that the best government promotes a free society. Keeping the government out of the business of patronizing arts ensures that all parties-individuals are not forced to advance causes against their beliefs, while the artists are not compelled to conform to government standards that are prone to change with the wind of politics and popular thought.

      What’s more, it may seem thoroughly ridiculous for the government to splash a large sum of money on the arts, which is nothing short of a luxury for most of the taxpayers, while apparently we have more pressing needs, such as health care and social secure.

      In a nutshell, it will be a win-win policy to get the government out of the art business, with better art and more rational allocation of taxpayers’ money。


    发表回复

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册用户 新浪微博登陆

    本版积分规则

    帮助中心
    网友中心
    购买须知
    支付方式
    服务支持
    资源下载
    售后服务
    定制流程
    关于我们
    关于我们
    友情链接
    联系我们
    关注我们
    官方微博
    官方空间
    官方微信
    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表