Question:ffice
ffice" />
Improvement in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the government of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
There is much controversitis over the issue that whether or not rich countries should be more responsible for the development of their more unfortunate counterparts. As far as I am concerned, those benign aids could make it possible for the poor nation to keep pace with these “giants” comprehensively in the world stage.
Assisting by richer nations are beneficial for the undeveloped countries , simply because advanced knowledge imparted could be essential for those nations in changing the present unsatisfying conditions and thus add more weight for their future development. Of these, more concerns are put on the issues of health of their inhabitant. As in health, for instance, it is well known that poor countries, such as South Africa, is suffering a lot from AIDS which is incurable at the time and greatly reduce the number of available labor forces. It is encouraging to see that countries like USA and Britain are investing big research dollars on the disease and supply free medication in order to prevent its contamination for mutual interests.
Education, no doubt, should be paid more attention too by the industrialized countries. As it is often pointed out the “Knowledge is power”, science and technology make a big difference on the development of those poor countries. Education produces sufficient competent and knowledgeable constructers who could make greater material improvement, which then add to the advances of innovative intelligence.
When it comes to the problem of trade, in my opinion, though immense helps are in demand from the point of view of poor nations, inequality often arises in dealing with economic situations. Rich countries tend to exploit, to the utmost magnitude, the natural resources and labor force of poor nations, which greatly their block the way of their progress. As a result of that unfair exchange, the depletion of raw material makes those countries even poorer, which starts out a vicious circle. Thus, It is better to leave such issues as the global market regulation by all nations not by autocracy of big nations.
In conclusion, helps from industrialized nations are more than welcome. It is believed that the influences are far-reaching and effects will thus accelerate other aspects of national productivity as far as inequality and monopoly are being avoided.
