33 12
发新话题
打印

何钢写的03年9月13日议论文

何钢写的03年9月13日议论文

It is right that college graduates earn higher salaries than the less well-educated in the community. But they should also pay the full cost of their study. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

fficeffice" />

It is commonly recognized that wages are the appropriate compensation for tasks completed or jobs successfully performed. Yet it is often the case that people with higher education have been offered more money than those without. I find it justifiable but do not share the opinion that college graduates should be fully responsible for their educational expenses.

It can be argued that some successful people do not have a college degree and yet are very wealthy and the success of many ffice:smarttags" />Hollywood movie stars as well as sports professionals can testify to this argument. However, people who have received college education can generally make a greater contribution to their employers and their country. As a result, compared with most high school graduates, they have higher salaries on average. Indeed, people without a college degree are usually insufficiently prepared or not well-trained to fit for the positions normally held by college graduates. Many high school leavers are thus restrained to menial jobs.

Besides, college graduates have made more sacrifices and spend more years studying than high school graduates. And a higher income is the ideal compensation for their efforts made and sweat shed. If the highly-educated does not have a higher, not to mention a lower, income, then people would be discouraged from entering the tertiary institution and so it may do harm to the national economy.

Some people would argue that since society gives college graduates more money, they need to pay their full cost of education as a return. Yet we should not ignore that many students come from average or even disadvantaged families. Without the financial aid from the university or the country, they may not be able to support themselves to complete their education. In addition, the attraction of a partly or fully funded college education can act as a driving force for students to aspire for higher education.

In summary, it is quite reasonable for the highly-educated to have a more handsome pay than the less well-educated and they should be financed in their college study.

Auguries of Innocence ---William Blake To see a world in a grain of sand And a heaven in a wild flower, Hold infinity in the palm of your hand And eternity in an hour.
hahahaha sofa !!!!! 美文. 能不能多多发送范文.一天一篇,ok? 比如这篇的思路,何大师可否指点一,二? young people are important resources to their country, but governments may ignore some problems faced by young people in running the country. By your experience, what does government need to do for supporting or helping young people? Please show those problems and give your idea or suggestion to solve the issue.
高手就是高手,一定好好拜读何老师大作.


虽然考完了,不过学无止境啊。

Avon & Somerset
KOOL!!!


U R SO Great!

thanks


       

I'm in Australia, my teacher said that this article was at 9 level. my god!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

支持何钢老大![em02]

谢啦

Very nice!

But i think 'high-school leavers' is better than 'high-school gruduates'

何老师,差不多一年没见你了,特想你啊!!!

什么时候能再见啊,呜呜---

跟我的审题有很大偏差,

我认为题目第一句“It is right that college graduates earn higher salaries than the less well-educated in the community”是对现实的一个描述,也就是说不必去讨论是否属实的问题,

而第二句“But they should also pay the full cost of their study.” 才是题目的观点,是题目要求我们去论述是否同意的观点。所以通篇应该放在对should they also pay the full cost of their study 上。

何老师,我这样的审题会不会导致偏题?按照我的观点,你这篇文章可算偏了

何老师:

请问:

在新东方雅思班上所用的那本写作教材中,其《雅思议论文写作》、《雅思精彩范文》和《最新雅思写作范文》中所有涉及到的“题目”是否都是雅思近年来考过的题目?

2。雅思作文题目的重考几率大吗?在今年9月18日考试,是否会碰到近期考过的题目?
3。临考前准备近几个月的雅思作文曾考题目好吗?
谢谢您!
[em01][em01][em01]
如果将字母 A 到 Z 分别编上 1 到 26 的分数,(A=1,B=2...,Z=26) 你的知识(KNOWLEDGE)得到 96 分(11+14+15+23+12+5+4+7+5=96) 你的努力(HARDWORK)也只得到 98 分(8+1+18+4+23+15+18+11=98) 你的态度(ATTITUDE)才是左右你生命的全部(1+20+20+9+20+21+4+5=100)
11楼的同学跟我想的一样。题目中第一句话"It is right that..."的表达形式是一个“让步”,而后说的是否应该pay full cost of their study才应该是文章论述的焦点。可何老居然在第2,3两段论述大学毕业生earning higher salary is justifiable, 请何老师解释一下为什么。另外在无忧网上还有一篇写这个题目的文章,叫牛津学生的9分雅思作文,作者在文中居然用了很大篇幅论述“大学毕业生不一定就会有高收入”。唉!真让人闹不清到底应该怎么写了!此外,剑2的Test4中的大作文的例文的内容也有些令人匪夷所思。

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-9-10 12:22:24编辑过]


An individual human existence should be like a river, small at first, narrowly contained within its banks, and rushing passionately past boulders and over waterfalls.
我上过何钢老师的课,真的很不错!!!
恩,写得好

i have the same qustion to this arguement:what shall we argue for ?

under my comprehension,"it is right that...." is just a structured set of the reasons,which is not sole purpose to provide in arguing.what we need to extend and evidence is the following proposition of whether we need to pay full cost of their study.

it seems more logical and pertinent.However,it is a nice basic pattern of arguementative essay both in sufficiently persuasive and logic understanding

美倒谈不上,不过结构思路很清晰

college的毕业生只能申请技术工人的职位, 工资并不高. 这个题目有点可笑.

ShirazBJ@Hotmail.com ShirazBJ@Firefly 请用网络电话和我联系,号码: 80740001 Firefly网络电话软件可以在这里下载: https://www.freshtel.net/

提的有道理

高手啊!
 33 12
发新话题
Google